<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inviting In the Big, Bad Government Wolf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fedexcess.info/2008/03/16/inviting-in-the-big-bad-government-wolf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fedexcess.info/2008/03/16/inviting-in-the-big-bad-government-wolf/</link>
	<description>When You Absolutely, Positively Have to Have Accurate Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:35:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AG&#8217;s Question FedEx Employment Practices &#124; FedExcess</title>
		<link>http://www.fedexcess.info/2008/03/16/inviting-in-the-big-bad-government-wolf/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>AG&#8217;s Question FedEx Employment Practices &#124; FedExcess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedexcess.info/?p=5#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] noted in two earlier posts from over a year ago (HERE and HERE), FedEx continues to face questioning and investigation into its alleged use and abuse of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noted in two earlier posts from over a year ago (HERE and HERE), FedEx continues to face questioning and investigation into its alleged use and abuse of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.fedexcess.info/2008/03/16/inviting-in-the-big-bad-government-wolf/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedexcess.info/?p=5#comment-9</guid>
		<description>If congress is going to make a move to &quot;even the playing field&quot;, shouldn&#039;t it be in the right direction? I understand, Libs in control would NEVER do the right thing and &quot;even the playing field&quot; by placing the other companies besides Fed Ex under the same classification as Fed Ex and even it that way because they are beholding to the Labor Unions.

But I&#039;M NOT beholding to the labor unions, therefore I am free to use common sense exclusively when I form my opinion, which is:

Rather than looking at it as though, if there are 30 companies that provide this service (for example), there are 29 companies &quot;down&quot; and 1 &quot;to go&quot; in terms of them being under the correct governmental classification (which is Pro-Union), I choose to argue that it is the opposite, and we have 1 company &quot;down&quot; and 29 &quot;to go&quot;. Screw the unions and screw congress and I&#039;m not willing to &quot;give in&quot; because it seems hopeless. God Bless Fed Ex&#039;s good fortune in being the lone hold-out, and by the grace of God, one day maybe we can anti-unionize the whole country since Unions and their contracts with their bloated retirement packages, medical care packages, forced inefficiencies they create by tying the hands of company management with their contracts that force crappy employees to remain employed and even get promoted, etc... and enough of our voting population may one day realize this and elect the right people with the right mandates which in turn could allow us to &quot;anti-unionize&quot; the country.  In which case, we will have to switch Fed Ex back to where they are now. Let&#039;s save that step, call them &quot;one down&quot;, and focus on changing everybody else. It&#039;s OBVIOUS which is better for business. Now, let&#039;s get pro-business leaders to vote accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If congress is going to make a move to &#8220;even the playing field&#8221;, shouldn&#8217;t it be in the right direction? I understand, Libs in control would NEVER do the right thing and &#8220;even the playing field&#8221; by placing the other companies besides Fed Ex under the same classification as Fed Ex and even it that way because they are beholding to the Labor Unions.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;M NOT beholding to the labor unions, therefore I am free to use common sense exclusively when I form my opinion, which is:</p>
<p>Rather than looking at it as though, if there are 30 companies that provide this service (for example), there are 29 companies &#8220;down&#8221; and 1 &#8220;to go&#8221; in terms of them being under the correct governmental classification (which is Pro-Union), I choose to argue that it is the opposite, and we have 1 company &#8220;down&#8221; and 29 &#8220;to go&#8221;. Screw the unions and screw congress and I&#8217;m not willing to &#8220;give in&#8221; because it seems hopeless. God Bless Fed Ex&#8217;s good fortune in being the lone hold-out, and by the grace of God, one day maybe we can anti-unionize the whole country since Unions and their contracts with their bloated retirement packages, medical care packages, forced inefficiencies they create by tying the hands of company management with their contracts that force crappy employees to remain employed and even get promoted, etc&#8230; and enough of our voting population may one day realize this and elect the right people with the right mandates which in turn could allow us to &#8220;anti-unionize&#8221; the country.  In which case, we will have to switch Fed Ex back to where they are now. Let&#8217;s save that step, call them &#8220;one down&#8221;, and focus on changing everybody else. It&#8217;s OBVIOUS which is better for business. Now, let&#8217;s get pro-business leaders to vote accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FedEx and Independent Contractor Abuse &#171; FedExcess</title>
		<link>http://www.fedexcess.info/2008/03/16/inviting-in-the-big-bad-government-wolf/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>FedEx and Independent Contractor Abuse &#171; FedExcess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedexcess.info/?p=5#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] About Chuck Muth                   &#171; Inviting In the Big, Bad Government Wolf [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] About Chuck Muth                   &laquo; Inviting In the Big, Bad Government Wolf [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
