In the most recent edition of FedEx’s absurdly misnamed “The Brown Bailout Newsletter,” the company’s ghost-writer asks:
“How much is UPS willing to pay for a secret, anti-competitive bailout that could raise consumer prices and reduce reliability in overnight deliveries? For UPS, its lobbying costs nearly tripled in the past three months alone. UPS spent $4.4 million on lobbying charges between July and September, more than three times as much in the previous quarter ($1.4 million).
“So what did the $4.4 million buy UPS? A UPS spokesman who was quoted in a Bloomberg article on the lobby expenditures said a ‘significant portion’ of the increased lobbying costs went to an employee letter writing campaign on labor legislation and other activities ‘to educate officials about our perspective…’”
1.) There is no bailout…as we all know. Calling a dog a horse doesn’t make a dog a horse. This is just FedEx’s silly PR effort to fool the uneducated into thinking there’s a bailout involved where no bailout is involved. It’s dishonest as hell, but FedEx couldn’t care less.
2.) There’s nothing “secret” about this issue at all. We’re talking about a very public piece of federal legislation which has been discussed and debated and considered for many months. And in reality, this issue has been around for YEARS. Falsely calling this bill “secret” is, again, dishonest. But at least it’s par for the FedEx course.
3.) FedEx claims the bill “could” raise consumer prices without backing up its claim. This is just a “feeling” FedEx has. If the bill passes, FedEx says this might happen or that might happen – but no one can say for sure that ANY of FedEx’s doomsday scenarios will ever take place.
4.) FedEx claims the bill “could” reduce reliability in overnight deliveries. Again, they don’t back up their claim. It’s just a feeling. The subliminal message they are trying to convey, however, is that the bill *might* result in FedEx going union, and that the union *might* someday go out on strike, and if it does, there *might* be an impact on express deliveries.
Thank goodness we’d still have UPS to pick up the slack!
5.) But the most outrageous aspect of this typically outrageous piece of FedEx propaganda is this whining about UPS increasing its lobbying efforts over the last three months – as though there was some sinister, underhanded “black box” operation going on. What a load of flapdoodle.
Here’s what really happened…
Last June, FedEx launched a largely anonymous, misleading, multi-million dollar attack campaign against UPS in an effort to retain special treatment under the law which gives them a huge marketing advantage over their competitors.
If you want to talk about “secret,” just try asking FedEx which PR firm is behind their dishonest advertising campaign and how much they’re spending on it.
In any event, UPS reportedly went to their employees, explained how FedEx’s ad campaign was jeopardizing their livelihoods, and helped them contact their members of Congress on a piece of pending legislation.
The company has simply been responding to FedEx’s attacks – and the cost of that campaign, unlike FedEx’s efforts, is open and fully disclosed.
And since when did it become wrong for citizens of the United States to contact their elected representatives in Congress, educate them about their perspective, and petition for redress of a grievance – in this case the unfair and special treatment FedEx enjoys under our labor laws?
Oh, and by the way – FedEx is nothing if not a master of hypocrisy on this issue.
In the same email newsletter complaining about UPS employees contacting their members of Congress, “The Brown Bailout Newsletter” includes this prominent link:
“Act Now: If you haven’t written your legislators, do it now.”
Shameless.
#1 by C.S on October 23rd, 2009
| Quote
The extent that Fedex will go to mislead the public is on full display for everyone to see. Now, just imagine how they mislead their own employees.
Here’s my experience with dealing with Fedex. I along with everyone else that hires on with Fedex is told that all couriers reach top pay within 4 years. They start most couriers around $13 or $14 per hour and top pay is around $22 per hour. I’ve been working at Fedex for 7 years and my pay has only gone up by about $2.50 an hour. When one of us asked about their promise about all couriers topping out in 4 years their response is ” if you don’t like it quit”, “fedex didn’t come knocking at your door” or this is the best one yet “Why would you wanna be topped out? If we let you top out then you wouldn’t have anything to look forward to” I hope the Senators will make a fair decision when they finally vote on this issue, because it isn’t just UPS that would like to see this bill pass. The Fedex hourly workers also have an interest in seeing this bill pass.
#2 by LRex on October 25th, 2009
| Quote
Does anyone else find it funny that Fedex is complaining about the lobbying money that UPS has spent when the amount that Fedex has spent on lobbying is quite a bit more. The American people need to realize that Fedex is calling this a “bailout” to try to drum up decent. This section of the FAA reauthorization act actually would only allow Fedex employees the right to vote in Unions locally. Fedex has lobbied to keep this excemption for years and now that they would have to actually face their employees having the right to choose yes or no for a Union they are calling this a “bailout”. This is a very misleading campaign and if it ever receives any major attention from the media the public will see that.
#3 by FedEx 4 Life on October 27th, 2009
| Quote
I agree here. Both companies are spending a lot of money to voice their concerns over this legislation. That’s why PAC, lobbyists and other legalized extortion committees exist today.
UPS picking up the slack? I’d like to see UPS cross another brothers line in a strike. That is a big no-no.
As far as a bailout, that term is debatable, but the bottom line is that UPS built their air express model after FedEx (it was no secret how they operated), failed to get reclassified under the RLA and then switched sides and joined the Teamsters lobbying efforts against FedEx. What do you call that?